RESUMO
Background: Following the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for 4-weekly antenatal intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy using sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP), there is a need to evaluate the drug performance in order to determine their effectiveness as tools in malaria control policy. Objectives: To determine prevalence of cord blood malaria, compliance gap and adverse pregnancy outcomes (anaemia, preterm delivery, spontaneous abortion, intra-uterine foetal death and low birth weight) among antenatal IPTp-SP users compared with non-users. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among consenting 390 participants who were administered a questionnaire, and paired blood samples were collected from the venous blood of participants and neonatal cord immediately after delivery. The participants were categorised as IPTp-SP users and non-users. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were assessed. Neonatal birth weights were also measured within 1 h after delivery. Malaria parasitaemia and anaemia were analysed using standard parasitological and haematological methods of examination. Data were analysed using SPSS version 25 for Windows and p-value of < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Of 390 women, 336 (86.2%) were IPTp-SP users, while 54 (13.8%) were non-users. The compliance gap was 13.8%. Malaria parasitemia in pregnant women (21.7% versus 53.7%; p < 0.001) and their babies (12.2% versus 25.4%; p = 0.002) were observed for IPTp-SP users and non-users, respectively. The prevalence of maternal anaemia was 27(8.0%) in IPTp-SP users and 5 (9.3%) in non-users (p = 0.789). Mean parasite density was reduced in IPTp-SP users than in non-users (p < 0.001). Correlation of birth weight according to their sex showed a weak correlation [correlation coefficient (r) = 0.027; p = 0.736]. Pregnant women with preterm delivery, spontaneous abortion, intra-uterine foetal death, and low birth weight were significantly lower (p < 0.001, for all) in IPTp-SP users compared with non-users. Conclusion: Although the compliance gap was low, IPTp-SP users had significantly better pregnancy and foetal outcomes compared with non-users. Efforts should be intensified towards achieving total compliance in IPTp-SP usage by pregnant women.
RESUMO
Objective: To assess the accuracy of hysterosalpingography in diagnosis of uterine and/or tubal factor infertility, using hysterolaparoscopy with dye test as the gold standard with an implication for which test should be the first-line investigation. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study of 96 women who underwent hysterosalpingography and hysterolaparoscopy with dye test. All women within reproductive age group with utero-tubal infertility who underwent both hysterosalpingography and hysterolaparoscopy with dye-test procedure were included. The outcome measures were proportions of tubal blockage and intrauterine pathology. Individual and overall mean accuracy were calculated for hysterosalpingography, using hysterolaparoscopy with dye test as the gold standard. Patient had procedure of hysterosalpingography first and both laparoscopic surgeons and patients were blinded to the outcome of hysterolaparoscopy with dye test until analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Overall, 128 women were assessed for eligibility while 96 women finally completed the study. Hysterosalpingography demonstrated diagnostic accuracy of 77.8% (p < 0.001), 76.3% (p < 0.001) and 78.3% (p < 0.001) for right, left and bilateral tubal blockage, respectively. Overall accuracy of hysterosalpingography tubal factor assessment was 77.4 ± 0.8% (95% confidence interval = 76.5% to 78.4%). Hysterosalpingography showed an accuracy of 85.7%, 86.6% and 76.7% for right, left and bilateral hydrosalpinx, respectively, given overall diagnostic accuracy of 83.0 ± 5.1% (95% confidence interval = 77.9% to 88.1%). Overall accuracy of hysterosalpingography in diagnosing intrauterine pathology was 68.5 ± 9.8% (95% confidence interval = 53.9% to 83.1%). Conclusion: Hysterosalpingography detects tubal blockade and intrauterine pathology poorly compared to hysterolaparoscopy with dye test. Hysterosalpingography may face unpredictable clinical situations biased by technological error, leading to unsuccessful evaluation and uncertain diagnosis. Although the cost-effectiveness, risk of surgery or anaesthesia flaws hysterolaparoscopy with dye test. Hysterosalpingography should not be the first-line utero-tubal assessment tool rather hysterolaparoscopy with dye test.
